Friday, February 2, 2018

Incident at Colgone - Pershing vs. Panther

Taking a rather long break from figures, I decided to pick up a Tamiya 1:48 scale M26 Pershing kit. The build was very simple - the only fiddly work was the multi-section tank treads. Hadn't built a model kit in some years; in fact, the last one was a Tamiya 1:48 scale M10 Tank Destroyer. These kits have metal bottom hulls, so make for a nice weighty gaming piece. Anyway, had to take out a Corgi 1:50 scale Panther for a photo op. This is an interpretation (using existing terrain pieces) for that famous tank battle near the Cologne Cathedral in the last days of the war in Europe.
The Panther had just taken out an M4 Sherman of the 3rd Armored Division, and luckily an M26 Pershing was only few streets away. The Pershing hunted down the Panther and made a direct hit on the move. The Panther never got off a shot - possibly due to the crew not immediately recognizing the Pershing and thinking it was a German tank? The Pershing made a few more shots and the existing video shows some of the German crew escaping from the burning Panther.
EDIT: Previously, I had posted I wasn't sure how the Pershing fared against Tigers. I've since found out that a Pershing from the 3rd Armored Division was indeed knocked out by a Tiger I on 26 Feb 45. In fact, the Pershing that was hit was named "Fireball" - the decal on this kit! It sustained three hits, one to the gun which exploded a chambered 90mm round. The gun tube was replaced and the tank returned to service. The Loader and Gunner were killed.
Speaking of Tigers and Panthers, here's an example of each with the Pershing for size comparison. Again, the Panther is a Corgi 1:50 scale diecast (repainted with zimmerit); the King Tiger is a 1:48 diecast by Hobby Master (OOP, I think).
A view from above of the same three tanks. Note how wide the track base is on the Pershing. Pretty modern looking IMO. In fact, the basic design of the Pershing changed very little with subsequent US tanks up until the M1 Abrams.
And a comparison with contemporary US tanks of the time. A resin 1:48 scale M3 Stuart made by Kengi and Corgi 1:50 scale diecast M4 Sherman on either side of the Pershing. For the record, I'm on the lookout for a 1:48 or 1:50 scale M24 Chaffee. Thinking of a late-WW2 or Korean War Bolt Action unit.
A view from above of the same three tanks. The Pershing was sprayed with a Testors Olive Drab enamel and given a pin wash at the seams, etc. The color is sort of lighter than what I had expected, but there's a ton of discussion on the "proper" color of WW2 US Olive Drab - so I'll leave it as is.
And finally, the antagonists side by side. So much for now - just wanted to post something on the old blog to let you all know I still exist.Until next time, warmest regards to you all!

24 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Thanks, Aaron! A nice diversion from the Middle Ages. Warm regards, Dean

      Delete
  2. Excellent history lesson, and comparisons. Thanks Dean.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks,Jake I hope I didn't come off as an armor expect, but wanted to add details from sources I read. Best regards, Dean

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. Thanks, Jonathan. It's nice that WW2 US armor is usually only OD.:) Warmest regards, Dean

      Delete
  4. Replies
    1. Thanks, Michal! Appreciate your kind words. Best regards, Dean

      Delete
  5. Impressive comparisons, and nice post Dean!

    ReplyDelete
  6. That overhead shot of US tanks shows why the Pershing would have been less than a sure thing as the main US battle tank in 1944. It would be tough to fit those onto ocean going transports. Certainly the US would have had to field fewer armored divisions.

    I love those Tamiya 1:48 kits. In my opinion, they are the best engineered kits on the market, even beating out Tamiya's 1:35 kits!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I read somewhere that the Army never intended the Sherman to go head to head with German armor, and was designed more for speed with infantry support. Oh, and 1:48 Tamiya is indeed a pleasure to build - I finally picked up a bottle of their liquid cement with applicator brush - waaay better than that squeeze bottle Testors glue I have - which always clogs up! Best, Dean

      Delete
  7. Interesting post and great looking tanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you very much, Simon. Now I need to get them on the gaming table sometime. Best regards, Dean

      Delete
  8. Replies
    1. Thanks, Christopher. I'm perusing ebay for some other Tamiya kits :) Warm regards, Dean

      Delete
  9. Very nice looking tank......pershing a bit too modern for me but love them really 😀

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Matt. Yes very late-war, introduced only in the last months. I was thinking of a Korean War Bolt Action force in the future. Regards, Dean

      Delete
  10. That first photo in black and white was just stunning. Set the mood for the whole post. Well done sir.

    Cheers
    Kevin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you very much, Kevin. I had hoped the B&W image would convey that sentiment. Warmest regards, Dean

      Delete
  11. this is good idea.Impressive comparisons, and nice post Dean!

    หนังตลก

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you very much! Appreciate your visit and kind words. Best, Dean

      Delete
  12. Nice armour, I'm really enjoying building tanks again, I hadn't built one for 30+years before I built the Stuart, it was all italeri and tamiya in 1/35, tamiya certainly had the edge then, I thought the reason the m26 didn't arrive till late was the insistence of high command that the sherman was perfectly fine and everyone was happy with it but once they got into northern Europe and met some big cats they prioritised the m26 to have some parity, interesting post.
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Iain. Yes, the Army's doctrine on tanks was more as support for infantry assaults, or something along those lines. Sadly, many tankers lost their lives because of this. I have another 1:48 Tamiya kit on the way too. Warm regards, Dean

      Delete